United States v. Wofford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining \[t]he evidence supporting the inference that [the defendant] was subjectively aware that his conduct was unauthorized and illegal also supports the inference that he had actual knowledge\
• embezzlement case in which defendant failed to investigate employees’ concerns after they asked him, “Don’t you think this might be illegal?”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).