Skip to main content
· 3/23/1992

United States v. Winton Gardiner

Citations

  • 955 F.2d 1492
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5046
  • 1992 WL 41269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant had not demonstrated “compelling” prejudice from the district court’s failure to sever counts
  • the “use of the word ‘punishable,’ rather than ‘punished,’ mandates that the sentencing court must consider the statutory maximum sentence—not the actual sentence—for the underlying offense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Johnson, Reavley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.