United States v. Winston Sanchez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming “[b]ased on th[e] evidence of repeat sales, the promise of future sales, standardized dealings, [] the level of trust between the parties,” and “the quantity of drugs,” and discussing factors
• affirming “[b]ased on th[e] evidence of repeat sales, the promise of future sales, standardized dealings, [] the level of trust between the parties,” and “the quantity of drugs,” and discussing factors
• affirming “[b]ased on th[e] evidence of repeat sales, the promise of future sales, standardized dealings, [] the level of trust between the parties,” and “the quantity of drugs,” and discussing factors
• calling a sufficiency of the evidence chal- lenge an “uphill battle”
• “[B]ecause the government cannot suppress evidence that does not exist at the time of the trial, there is no Brady violation as claimed by Sanchez.”
• the “government cannot suppress evidence that does not exist at the time of the trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).