Skip to main content
· 6/29/1932

United States v. Winneconne S. S. Co.

Citations

  • 59 F.2d 660
  • 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 3437
  • 1933 A.M.C. 170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court abused its discretion when dismissing an amended complaint with prejudice without giving the plaintiffs an opportunity to replead
  • “We review the court’s decision to dismiss a case with prejudice for abuse of discretion.”
  • “We review the court’s decision to dismiss a case with prejudice for abuse of discretion.”
  • fact that defen- dant will have to continue defending an action “does not con- stitute prejudice; rather, it is a generic assertion common to every defendant opposing a plaintiff’s motion to amend”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sibley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.