United States v. Windsor Capital Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he [attorney- client] privilege does not apply when in-house counsel is engaged in “nonlegal work.”
• “[S]o long as the communication is primarily or predominately of a legal character, the privilege is not merely lost by reason of the fact that it also dealt with nonlegal matters.” (internal quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).