United States v. Willie Peele

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where government was in no way responsible for publication of defendant’s photo in the newspaper, any suggestive power of the photo was a matter for cross-examination, not a hearing on exclusion
• “A case might arise where the mind of a witness is so clouded by suggestions from nongovernment sources that a conviction based principally on the testimony of that witness violates due process, but that point was not approached in the instant case.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).