United States v. Williamson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that digital scales found with narcotics “provides support to the conclusion that [the defendant] had an intent to distribute”
• noting that, although “‘[t]he trial court has a pivotal role in evaluating Batson claims,’ . . . we are also cognizant that the Supreme Court has made plain that appellate review of alleged Batson errors is not a hollow act”
• “We have held in the past that the mere possession of a quantity of drugs inconsistent with personal use will suffice for the jury to find intent to distribute.”
• \We have held in the past that the mere possession of a quantity of drugs inconsistent with personal use will suffice for the jury to find intent to distribute.\
• “We have held in the past that the mere possession of a quantity of drugs inconsistent with personal use will suffice for the jury to find intent to distribute.”
• “We have held in the past that the mere possession of a quantity of drugs inconsistent with personal use will suffice for the jury to find intent to distribute.” (emphasis added) (citation omitted); United States v. Mays, 466 F.3d 335, 341 (5th Cir. 2006) (same

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• The People v. Harris
  California Supreme Court· 2013-08-26· cited 298×
• United States v. Brown
  Fifth Circuit· 2008-12-18· cited 121×
• United States v. Williams
  Fifth Circuit· 2010-06-24· cited 67×
• Davis v. Fisk Electric Co.
  Texas Supreme Court· 2008-09-26· cited 56×
• United States v. Renee Pratt
  Fifth Circuit· 2013-08-28· cited 26×
• United States v. Williamson
  Fifth Circuit· 2010-03-02· cited 11×
• United States v. Araceli Garcia
  Fifth Circuit· 2018-02-22· cited 6×
• United States v. Campos-Ayala
  Fifth Circuit· 2024-06-07· cited 4×
• United States v. Williams
  Fifth Circuit· 2010-07-28
• Donald Davis v. Fisk Electric Company, Fisk Technologies & Fisk Management, Inc.
  Texas Supreme Court· 2008-09-26
• Winzer, Henry Andre
  Texas Supreme Court· 2015-10-19
• Winzer, Henry Andre
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-10-19
• United States v. Giaimis
  Fifth Circuit· 2014-06-30
• United States v. McCree
  Fifth Circuit· 2025-12-01

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miller-El v. Cockrell
  Supreme Court· 2003-02-25· cited 27,550×
• Batson v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
• Hernandez v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
• Purkett v. Elem
  Supreme Court· 1995-05-15· cited 3,008×
• Miller-El v. Dretke
  Supreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 1,931×
• Snyder v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 2008-03-19· cited 1,296×
• United States v. Williams
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-08-30· cited 157×
• United States v. Jose Hector Santos Vergara
  Fifth Circuit· 1982-09-14· cited 157×
• United States v. Moreno
  Fifth Circuit· 1999-08-17· cited 133×
• United States v. Bishop
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-08-29· cited 125×
• United States v. David N. Williams-Hendricks
  Fifth Circuit· 1986-12-16· cited 106×
• United States v. Mays
  Fifth Circuit· 2006-09-29· cited 101×
• United States v. Kates
  Fifth Circuit· 1999-05-04· cited 57×
• United States v. Montgomery
  Fifth Circuit· 2000-04-19· cited 56×
• Talebnejad v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2007-02-20· cited 18×