United States v. Williams, Kevin C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• maintaining precedent that drug quantity is a sentencing factor because \Jones [I] never ultimately resolved the constitutional doubts it raised\
• declining to extend Jones to § 841(b), holding that drug quantity is a sentencing factor, not an element of the offense
• maintaining precedent that drug quantity is a sentencing factor because \Jones [I] never ultimately resolved the constitutional doubts it raised\
• “This circuit has recognized, as has every other circuit to consider the issue, that the courts are without authority to displace the consular function in the issuance of visas.”
• circuit precedent binding unless “eviscerat[ed]” by subsequent Supreme Court decisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).