United States v. William Whittington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 36 was inapplicable when a court order “fundamentally changed the sentence appellant had earlier received”
• holding that Rule 36 could not be used to “fundamentally change[] the sentence [the] appellant had earlier received”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).