United States v. William Trotter, in No. 75--1709, and Vincent Nuzzo. Appeal of Vincent Nuzzo, in No. 75--1710

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Many courts .. . have given a broad construction to the requirement that a □ statement be ‘in furtherance’ of the conspiracy.”
• approving a broad construction of the “in furtherance of” requirement
• adopting substantive standard \more severe than the prima facie standard\
• adopting substantive standard “more severe than the prima facie standard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).