United States v. William Terrell Burney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “district court fulfilled its Rule 11(c
• finding no error where district court advised defendant of the maximum imprisonment term for each count, thereby implicitly disclosing “the possibility of consecutive sentencing”
• finding no error where district court advised defendant of the maximum imprisonment term for each count, thereby implicitly disclosing “the possibility of consecutive sentencing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).