United States v. William T. Canan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the defendant’s argument that there was insufficient evidence to convict him under § 1028(a)(6) because the document he possessed was from a defunct law enforcement agency but not deciding whether § 1028(a)(6
• though conduct described in affidavit was four years old, evidence of ongoing nature defeated claim of staleness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).