United States v. William T. Boston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming jury instruction specifying that government must “prove that the natural consequences of the acts or attempted acts alleged in the indictment would be to delay, interrupt or affect ‘interstate commerce’ ”
• government need only prove that defendant “ ‘actually or potentially obstructed, delayed or affected interstate commerce or attempted to do so.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).