· 5/13/1986
United States v. William Paul Scott
Citations
- 789 F.2d 795
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 25067
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding time limit on defendant’s testimony where “the jury received a full picture” of defendant’s case and “[a]ny further testimony would have been cumulative”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schroeder, Fletcher, MacBride
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.