Skip to main content
· 9/28/1983

United States v. William O. Radseck

Citations

  • 718 F.2d 233
  • 14 Fed. R. Serv. 56
  • 53 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 807
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16471

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming admission of summary charts where “[t]he jury was admonished by the court that the exhibits purported to be only ‘the Government’s submission of the Government’s theory’ ” of the case
  • “ ‘The nature of a summary witness’s testimony requires that he draw conclusions based upon the evidence presented at trial.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eschbach, Coffey, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.