· 9/28/1983
United States v. William O. Radseck
Citations
- 718 F.2d 233
- 14 Fed. R. Serv. 56
- 53 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 807
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16471
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming admission of summary charts where “[t]he jury was admonished by the court that the exhibits purported to be only ‘the Government’s submission of the Government’s theory’ ” of the case
- “ ‘The nature of a summary witness’s testimony requires that he draw conclusions based upon the evidence presented at trial.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eschbach, Coffey, Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.