Skip to main content
· 8/31/1971

United States v. William Nieves and Edgar Edward Acosta

Citations

  • 451 F.2d 836
  • 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “uncontradicted” evidence that defendants “were willing to supply cocaine in large quantities and of excellent quality”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Mulligan, Per Curiam, Timbers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.