· 7/17/2003
United States v. William Nelson Davis
Citations
- 336 F.3d 920
- 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6309
- 2003 Daily Journal DAR 7934
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14337
- 2003 WL 21665155
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We may affirm the district court on any basis supported by the record.”
- “In cases where the indictment tracks the words of the statute charging the offense, the indictment will be held sufficient so long as the words unambiguously set forth all elements neces- sary to constitute the offense.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson, Trott, Tallman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.