United States v. William Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, “although we have held that a district court's unfounded speculation that sex offenders are not deterrable may necessitate remand, we have done so only where the court imposed an above-guidelines sentence for purposes of deterrence” (citation omitted)
• remand necessary when sentencing court failed to consider argument regarding recidivism

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).