United States v. William M. Abroms

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that testimony about a meeting outside defendant’s presence but later related to him was relevant to show that conversation actually took place
• stating that a misrepresentation is material if it has the natural tendency to influence the decision of the tribunal on the issue to which it is addressed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).