United States v. William Lee Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “a suspect’s failure to object (or withdraw his consent) when an officer exceeds limits allegedly set by the suspect is a strong indicator that the search was within the proper bounds of the consent search”
• defendant’s express consent to search duffle bag extended to locked metal box inside the bag
• defendant’s express consent to search duffle bag extended to locked metal box inside the bag
• defendant’s express consent to search duffle bag extended to locked metal box inside the bag
• “The decision to admit evidence at trial is committed to the sound discretion of the district court and is subject to reversal only if the court abuses that discretion.”
• \[A] suspect's failure to object (or withdraw his consent) when an officer exceeds limits allegedly set by the suspect is a strong indicator that the search was within the proper bounds of the consent search.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).