· 2/8/2005
United States v. William L. Harris (03-6207) Tarvis Holmes (03-6255)
Citations
- 397 F.3d 404
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1970
- 2005 WL 291521
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[a] district court's application of § 924(c) is a question of law subject to de novo review”
- holding a firearm-type enhancement in § 924(c) is an element of the offense which must be charged in the indictment and proved to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt
- “If we look only at the theoretical possibility of a life sentence for any § 924(c
- “It is well-established in this circuit that an individual ‘can be convicted of using or carrying a firearm ..., even though he never personally used or carried any weapon during the period charged in the indictment.’ ”
- “It is well-established in this circuit that an individual ‘can be convicted of using or carrying a firearm . . ., even though he never personally used or carried any weapon during the period charged in the indictment.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keith, Moore, Gilman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.