Skip to main content
· 2/8/2005

United States v. William L. Harris (03-6207) Tarvis Holmes (03-6255)

Citations

  • 397 F.3d 404
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1970
  • 2005 WL 291521

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[a] district court's application of § 924(c) is a question of law subject to de novo review”
  • holding a firearm-type enhancement in § 924(c) is an element of the offense which must be charged in the indictment and proved to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt
  • “If we look only at the theoretical possibility of a life sentence for any § 924(c
  • “It is well-established in this circuit that an individual ‘can be convicted of using or carrying a firearm ..., even though he never personally used or carried any weapon during the period charged in the indictment.’ ”
  • “It is well-established in this circuit that an individual ‘can be convicted of using or carrying a firearm . . ., even though he never personally used or carried any weapon during the period charged in the indictment.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith, Moore, Gilman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.