United States v. William Kiyuyung

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Abousamra “did not testify that the closet doors were open before Branch entered the bathroom, did not testify that Quiles said the closet doors were open, and did not even venture to ascribe to Quiles a conclusory statement that the first gun had been in plain view”
• permitting an officer to seize immediately apparent incriminating evidence during a security check
• noting that Abousamra “did not testify that the closet doors were open before Branch entered the bathroom, did not testify that Quiles said the closet doors were open, and did not even venture to ascribe to Quiles a conclusory statement that the first gun had been in plain view”
• rejecting plain-view argument because Government failed to develop sufficient evidentiary record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).