United States v. William Kelvin Houston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was a Rule 32 violation by specifically noting that the district court had not adopted the PSR as its own findings
• ordering resentencing where district court seemed to assume, but did not explicitly decide, that death threats were attributable to defendant
• Rule 32(c)(1) violated when district court failed to “express[ly]” resolve conflict as to whether bank robber made threat of bodily injury to tellers
• requiring “strict compliance ■with Rule 32”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).