United States v. William K. Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no right of allocution exists at a supervised release revocation hearing
• rejecting Carper’s reasoning, and holding that Rule 32 does not provide a right of allocution at a revocation of probation or supervised release hearing
• vacating sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release without a hearing on defendant's objections to magistrate's report and recommendation
• acknowledging a 2 Case: 20-40210 Document: 00515796491 Page: 3 Date Filed: 03/25/2021 No. 20-40210 defendant’s right to be present at sentencing in the context of a revocation hearing
• “California courts apply the Title VII framework to claims brought under FEHA.”
• “California courts apply the Title VII framework to claims brought under FEHA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).