United States v. William Julian Herndon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the district court must provide the defendant a meaningful opportunity to prove [juror bias]”
• holding that “the district court must provide the defendant a meaningful opportunity to prove [juror bias]”
• holding that a district court abused its discretion in denying a party’s request for a hearing when juror and party had prior business dealings
• holding that \extraneous influences\ on a jury include \a bribe attempt on a juror\ and \newspaper articles and media attention\
• holding that “extraneous influences” on a jury include “a bribe attempt on a juror” and “newspaper articles and media attention”
• holding that juror’s recollection during jury deliberations that he might have had prior business dealings with the defendant constituted evidence of extraneous rather than internal influence on jury deliberations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).