United States v. William Joseph Butler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, on cross-examination, prosecutor was entitled to invoke “some of the details of the [defendant’s] previous convictions” after he attempted to minimize his misconduct
• government's inquiry into facts of pri- or conviction not improper, but only because the witness attempted to '‘minimize” prior conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).