United States v. William John Bauer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that this court has held that claims under section 455 \'will not be considered unless timely made'\
• rejecting defendant’s argument that he had good cause for filing untimely motion to disqualify sentencing judge in that he had out-of-state counsel who did not know that judge had previously served as United States Attorney while defendant had been investigated
• \This court has held that claims under § 455 `will not be considered unless timely made.'\
• “Because the record does not reflect how the district court performed that task in imposing Bauer's large fine, we are unable to provide meaningful appellate review. Therefore, we conclude that we must vacate Bauer’s fine and remand for redetermination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).