United States v. William J. McDonough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a settlement may reasonably and adequately serve the best 23 interest of a corporation on whose behalf the derivative action is brought even though no direct 24 monetary benefits are paid by the defendants to the corporation.
• “[W]e have some question about the continued viability of the Jones rule . . . .”
• “[W]e have some question about the continued viability of the Jones rule.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).