United States v. William Hester

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that no evidentiary hearing is necessary where the files and records of the case demonstrate that relief is unavailable or where the motion is based on a question of law
• stating that no evidentiary hearing is necessary where the files and records of the case demonstrate that relief is unavailable or where the motion is based on a question of law
• stating that no evidentiary hearing is necessary where the files and records of the case demonstrate that relief is unavailable or where the motion is based on a question of law
• “Hester, failing to apprise the trial court of this alleged misconduct, should not be allowed to inject ‘a defect into the trial, and later claim its benefit.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).