United States v. William Herman Dorman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court adequately considered the § 3553(a) factors when the substance of its decision showed that it had considered several of the factors
• recognizing that record indicated the district court “did, in fact, consider a number of the sentencing factors”
• holding that although the district court did not state it considered the statutory sentencing factors, it was sufficient that the record showed it had considered them
• holding that the district judge needn’t “state on the record that [he] has explicitly considered each of the § 3553(a) factors or to discuss each of the[m]”
• concluding that, while the district court did not specifically state that it had considered the factors, it necessarily considered a number of them by entertaining the defendant’s objections and motion for a downward departure
• concluding that, while the district court did not specifically state that it had considered the factors, it necessarily considered a number of them by entertaining the defendant’s objections and motion for a down- ward departure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).