United States v. William Henry Stokley, A/K/A Layne Mertz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding application of U.S.S.G. § 2K1.4(b) “did not foreclose consideration of [§ 3A1.3’s] adjustment since [ ] § 2K1.4(b) does not require a finding of physical restraint”
• victim physically prevented from leaving room in which defendant had placed a pipe bomb

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).