United States v. William F. Breckenridge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that five of the defendant's prior offenses which were consolidated for trial were related cases and remanding for findings on whether another offense prosecuted in a different jurisdiction was also related because it was part of a com- mon scheme or plan
• applying § 1B1.3 factors to determine common scheme or plan under § 4A1.2
• “[I]t is well-settled that ineffective assistance of counsel constitutes cause for [defeating the procedural bar for] failure to raise an issue” in a §2255 habeas proceeding.
• six burglaries committed within one month were committed in a short period of time
• under Virginia law, offenses may be charged together only if they were connected or constituted parts of a common scheme or plan, i.e., (1) the offenses were intimately connected or (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).