United States v. William Edward Zeiler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the broad publication of mugshots in news sources is not a state-arranged identification procedure
• noting courts “scrutinize[] pretrial identification procedures to prevent police and prosecuting officials from using 3 This claim requires evidence that could satisfy a two-step inquiry: (1) that the identification procedure was unnecessarily suggestive, and (2
• “Both Wade and Simmons were concerned with the conduct of law enforcement officials in unfairly influencing identifications.”
• “The credibility of witnesses’ subsequent identifications can be weighed by the jury in light of the witnesses’ statements as to their reactions to television or newspaper pictures.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).