Skip to main content
· 4/7/1992

United States v. William Droge

Citations

  • 961 F.2d 1030
  • 69 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1126
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6363
  • 1992 WL 75175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that resentencing is required if a judge imposes a sentence out of personal spite against the defendant
  • observing that the jury was properly instructed to determine whether the defendant “actually believed that he was not required to file a return or pay taxes”
  • upholding sentence where district court harshly chastised defendant at sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Timbers, Winter, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.