Skip to main content
· 3/8/2007

United States v. William D. Pierce, United States of America v. Shirley Best Pierce

Citations

  • 479 F.3d 546
  • 99 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1350
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5437
  • 2007 WL 685645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a federal district court may abstain from ruling where there are ongoing state judicial proceedings that implicate important state interests and that provide an adequate opportunity for the plaintiff to raise constitutional challenges
  • approving an instruction that stated the jury “should find the defendant guilty” of crimes committed by co-conspirators in furtherance of the conspiracy because “mandatory . . . Pinkerton instructions are fair statements of the law”
  • Pinkerton instruction given where defendants were charged with conspiracy against the United States, filing false tax returns, mail fraud and wire fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Melloy, Nangle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.