United States v. William Cortes-Claudio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, in some limited circumstances, a contemporaneous objection may not necessarily be required
• prison not required to provide exact substitute copy of 20 confiscated Bible, offer of another version of Bible sufficient
• \[A] post-sentence objection is not necessarily required to preserve the issue for appeal if the defendant could not reasonably have anticipated the issue would arise until after the court ruled.\
• the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to consider an argument that the plaintiff incorporated by reference from 27 briefing on a prior motion
• \[A] post-sentence objection is not necessarily required to preserve the issue for appeal if the defendant could not reasonably have anticipated the issue would arise until after the court ruled.\
• \[A] post-sentence objection is not necessarily required to preserve the issue for appeal if the defendant could not reasonably have anticipated the issue would arise until after the court ruled.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).