· 10/28/1994
United States v. William Charles Jenkins
Citations
- 38 F.3d 1143
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30361
- 1994 WL 588625
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a district court does not have jurisdictional authority to grant credit for time served
- holding that a district court does not have jurisdictional authority to 2 Case: 19-30406 Document: 00515397463 Page: 3 Date Filed: 04/28/2020 No. 19-30406 grant credit for time served
- explaining that “credit awards must be made by the Attorney General, through the Bureau of Prisons, after sentencing”
- rejecting defendant's position as \ignor[ing] the Supreme Court's unequivocal statement in Wilson that a district court does not have the authority to grant a sentence credit at sentencing\
- rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claims that are merely conclusory in nature and without supporting factual averments
- rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claims that are merely conclusory in nature and without supporting factual averments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baldock, Ebel, Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.