United States v. William C. Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the district court was reasonable “to conclude that [the defendant] engaged in his ‘unusual spending patterns’ to conceal his fraud on the government”
• stating “[t]he fact that Campbell did not use offshore bank accounts or transactions through fictitious business entities is unavailing”
• restating our holding in Hunt, but noting that “the Court’s rationale in Rita calls into question our reasons for not affording a presumption of reasonableness”
• stressing “the need to balance the right to counsel of choice with the need to ensure the integrity of the criminal justice system”
• reviewing “for clear error the district court’s findings of fact regarding whether a defendant should receive an enhanced sentence under the Guidelines” (citation and ellipsis omitted)
• reviewing the district court’s decision to disqualify the defendant’s counsel for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).