United States v. William Allen Jones, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on H.R.Rep. No. 650, 93d Cong., 1st Sess. 6-7 (1973), reprinted in 1974 U.S. Code Cong. & Admin. News 7075, 7080
• Congressional rejection of proposed rule that a judicially-noticed fact was conclusively established in criminal was due to concern that the proposed rule “violated the spirit, if not the letter, of the constitutional right to a jury trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).