United States v. William A. McClinton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that third factor is present where two interviews are conducted by officers from different jurisdictions
• holding fact that second interviewer was unaware of defendant’s refusal to talk in first interview supported inference that no Fifth Amendment violation
• observing that a defendant’s criminal record demonstrated familiarity with the criminal justice system, which decreased his susceptibility to pressure and, thus, his likelihood to make an involuntary statement to police
• observing that a defendant’s criminal record demonstrated familiarity with the criminal justice system, which decreased his susceptibility to pressure and, thus, his likelihood to make an involuntary statement to police
• second interviewer’s unawareness of defendant’s refusal to talk in first interview supports inference that Fifth Amendment rights were not violated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).