· 12/9/1986
United States v. Willard S. Carlock, Sr., Mitchell J. Scimemi, Willard S. Carlock, Jr., and Columbus J. Laird
Citations
- 806 F.2d 535
- 22 Fed. R. Serv. 164
- 124 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2334
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 36327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a \common illustration\ of an admissible opinion under Rule 701 is \an expression of opinion by a lay observer of a car's speed\
- “There is no sixth amendment right to a timely indictment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Wisdom, Higginbotham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.