Skip to main content
· 12/9/1986

United States v. Willard S. Carlock, Sr., Mitchell J. Scimemi, Willard S. Carlock, Jr., and Columbus J. Laird

Citations

  • 806 F.2d 535
  • 22 Fed. R. Serv. 164
  • 124 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2334
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 36327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a \common illustration\ of an admissible opinion under Rule 701 is \an expression of opinion by a lay observer of a car's speed\
  • “There is no sixth amendment right to a timely indictment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Wisdom, Higginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.