· 6/30/1980
United States v. Will Renfro
Citations
- 620 F.2d 497
- 6 Fed. R. Serv. 383
- 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 16142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that an appellate court lacks jurisdiction to review a magistrate judge’s ruling where the district court is “deprived” of its “ability to effectively review the magistrate’s holding”
- dismissing challenge to magistrate judge’s denial of a discovery motion that defendant did not appeal to the district court
- dismissing the portion of the appeal that asked the court to directly review a magistrate judge’s order, but hearing the remainder of the appeal on the merits
- “The law is settled that appellate courts are without jurisdiction to hear appeals directly from federal magistrates.”
- “The law is settled that appellate courts are without jurisdiction to hear appeals directly from federal magis- trates.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Godbold, Tjoflat, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.