United States v. Will Arthur Palmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comment that defense attorney wanted to “confuse” jury and “throw up a smoke screen” did not require reversal
• comment that defense attorney wanted to “confuse” jury and “throw up a smoke screen” did not require reversal
• comment that defense attorney wanted to ―confuse‖ jury and ―throw up a smoke screen‖ did not require reversal
• “Rather than an impermissible shift of the burden of proof, these comments were a response to defense counsel’s argument.”
• where evidence has no probative value, admission is clear error
• finding no error under these circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).