United States v. Wilfredo Mario Martinez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Teague applies to § 2255 petitions
• “[I]t would be anomalous to apply new rules of statutory interpretation retroactively, but not new constitutional rules, when collateral relief for statutory errors is more circumscribed than for errors of constitutional magnitude.”
• “[I]t would be anomalous to apply new rules of statutory interpretation retroactively, but not new constitutional rules, when collateral relief for statutory errors is more -7- circumscribed than for errors of constitutional magnitude.”
• applying Teague to both state and federal prisoners

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).