United States v. Wilfredo Bonilla-Comacho

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Nothing in Bonilla’s statement indicates that he was bragging about something he could not accomplish or that he was trying to seem like a bigger drug operator than he really was.”
• “Nothing in Bonilla’s statement indicates that he was bragging about something he could not ac- complish or that he was trying to seem like a bigger drug operator than he really was.”
• upholding obstruction enhancement where “[b]oth judge and jury found the government’s version of the events to be the truth and, as a result, . . . that [the defendant] lied on the stand”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).