United States v. Wilfred Walker Leyland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]o preserve his [double jeopardy] claims, [defendant] needed to raise his double jeopardy argument before pleading guilty”
• rejecting double jeopardy argument to successive prosecutions first raised after guilty plea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).