United States v. Wiley Hill, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that although it would be an abuse of discretion to ignore the policy statements, \they do not replace [a court's] discretion by a rule\
• “Precedents do not cease to be authoritative merely because counsel in a later case advance a new argument.”
• “We are not merely to count noses. The parties are entitled to our independent judgment.”
• “We are not merely to count noses. The parties are entitled to our independent judgment.”
• the responsibility for deciding when the sentence begins remains with the Attorney General
• the responsibility for deciding when the sentence begins remains with the Attorney General

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).