United States v. Wiesenfeld Warehouse Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Plaintiffs could not raise additional theories of 11 liability in an opposition to a motion to dismiss and instead 12 had to file a motion for leave to amend if they wanted to pursue 13 those claims
• “Raising a completely new theory of 26 liability . . . in a brief in opposition to a motion to dismiss does not grant [d]efendant 27 fair notice of [p]laintiffs’ claim or the grounds upon which it rests.”
• “Raising a completely new theory of liability, with only attenuated connection to the complaint, in a brief in opposition to a motion to dismiss” is improper and can only be accomplished after requesting leave to file an amended complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).