United States v. Wheeling Downs, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing plaintiff’s 14 due process claim challenging the adequacy of the prison’s administrative appeal procedure and 15 the disposition of his appeals
• “[r]uling against a prisoner on an administrative complaint does not cause or contribute to [a section 1983] violation.”
• dismissing plaintiff’s due 23 process claim challenging the adequacy of the prison’s administrative appeal procedure and the 24 disposition of his appeals
• dismissing plaintiff’s due 6 process claim challenging the adequacy of the prison’s administrative appeal procedure and the 7 disposition of his appeals
• dismissing claims 20 “based solely on [the defendants’] role in the inmate appeals process” but denying 21 motion to dismiss claims plausibly suggesting that other defendants “were involved 22 in authorizing or implementing the modified programs at issue”
• dismissing claims that were “based solely 21 on [the defendants’] role in processing plaintiff’s appeals” but denying motion to 22 dismiss claims against the warden who had “authority and discretion to justify the 23 modified programs at issue and deny plaintiff [administrative] relief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).