United States v. Wetzel-Sanders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in the absence of circuit court authorization, the \district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to decide the merits of\ a second or successive § 2255 motion
• “Although the district court could have transferred the matter to this court, or dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction, it should not have decided the motion.”
• dismissing appeal as COA was improvidently granted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).